The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. (Sun Tzu, 400-430 bc Chinese Military Strategist)
The Illuminati manipulate humanity through the mind and emotions. There are too many people and too few Illuminati to control people physically, except on a small scale. They have to manipulate the way the masses think and feel, so we live our lives and see the world in the way the Illuminati want us to. For instance, the most powerful of the manipulation techniques is one I call Problem Reaction Solution [aka dialectics]. It works like this:
You want to introduce something you know the people won't like. This may be more power to the police, a further erosion of basic freedoms, even a war. You know that if you offer these policies openly, the people will react against them. So you first create a PROBLEM, a rising crime rate, more violence, a terrorist bomb, a government collapse, or you get one of your Illuminati puppets like Saddam Hussein to go to war.
You make sure someone else is blamed for this problem and not you, the real people behind it all. So you create a "patsy", as they call them in America, a Timothy McVeigh or a Lee Harvey Oswald. You then use your media to tell people what they should think about your manufactured event and who they should blame for it. This brings us to stage two, the REACTION from the people "This can't go on what are THEY going to do about it?"
This allows THEY to then openly offer the SOLUTION to the problems THEY have secretly created - new legislation which advances their agenda of centralisation of global power or the erosion of more basic freedoms. This technique is being used all the time on the human mind and emotions, not least with the stream of mind controlled youngsters and adults who go crazy with guns around the world and immediately prompt gun control laws.
I say this as someone who does not have guns and believes passionately in non violence. But if we are going to be street wise we need to look beyond our own beliefs and realise that the Illuminati is seeking to systematically disarm those who WOULD use weapons against them. Just before Adolf Hitler began to fill the concentration camps he introduced the same anti gun legislation which we are seeing today all over the world.
We are now at a crucial time in this agenda's history. So many cards are waiting to be played by the Illuminati in the coming years. We are at a crossroads in human history. We can choose freedom or fall under the control of a global fascist state, a global version of Nazi Germany. (David Icke) - www.davidicke.com
The dialectic at work. Create violence through economic pressures, the media, mind control, agent provocateurs - thesis. Counter it with totalitarian measures, more mind control, police crackdowns, surveillance, drugging of the population - antithesis. What ensues is Orwell’s vision of 1984, a society of total control - synthesis. (Mind Control, World Control by Jim Keith)
It seemed for a time - two centuries, actually - that the United States of America was a good country, champion of justice, advocate of freedom, that sort of stuff. What was lost in the education of its own citizens, however, was the frequency with which it went to war, against interlopers who were invariably depicted as evil people on the wrong side of democratic progress.
A cursory perusal of this murderous American resume will reveal that it has always been the aggressor in all these big fights, even though the official histories bend the facts to show the U.S. was fighting for freedom against one tyrant or another. But as time passed and the world got smaller, it became obvious that the U.S. was running out of countries that it could call evil, declare war against, and then pulverize. Besides, once a country had been seriously obliterated, it simply took too long to rebuild it into a serious enemy again.
Clearly, if the same cartel that has essentially been running this country for all of its 227 years was to stay in power, it had to devise a new formula for finding constant enemies to fight, thereby enriching its own coffers and keeping its own citizenry from noticing too much about the way it actually conducts its business. So it devised a new system of actually creating its own enemies. It sponsored young malcontents to fight battles the served the purposes of the masters, provided them with weapons and support techniques, used them for awhile, and then seemingly cut them loose to develop on their own. Of course, all the while the progress of these young rebels was monitored by American intelligence agencies, for the purpose of determining exactly when they could be considered mature enough to reclassify them from a nominal ally fighting for U.S. interests into a nightmare threat fighting against U.S. interests. The key element in making this process work was fabricating staged terror events that were actually perpetrated against our own citizens but then cleverly blamed on these various foreign provocateurs whom the U.S. had carefully nurtured and brought to maturity.
The U.S. learned this trick from Israel, which had successfully used the technique throughout Europe (principally in Germany) and specifically in Iraq in the 1940s, to convince its own people of the dangers posed by "enemies" it had previously supported, for the purpose of creating a hysteria to compel more Jews to move to Israel. Of course, now we see how Israel has used this staged terror formula to elicit world support for its illegal occupation of Palestine. And more vividly, we see how the staged terror events in New York City have driven a large part of Western Civilization into a new, crusade-like rage against the peoples of Islamic countries. Serious historians will note this has all been done before, but the general population contains few serious historians, so most people don't notice that the current War on Terror is simply a replay of the European royals' propaganda used to attack Middle Eastern peoples some eight hundred years ago, and ever since. And lest you think all this is merely a flight of literary fancy, I bid you consider the careers of Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein, both of whom were catapulted into the public eye as fledgling CIA operatives, bin Laden as an Arab counterculture hero (and cheered on by his family) who rode to the rescue (with large amounts of cash) of the Afghani mujahadeen, accompanied by plenty of assistance from Ronald Reagan's CIA wheeler-dealers; and Saddam as one of the triggermen in a 1968 coup in Iraq that was of course fueled by support from the, you-guessed-it, CIA. So for these folks to develop into threats against the world (and this is not to mention Panama's Manuel Noriega, who also followed the same progressive curriculum as a pawn in the South American drug game and good friend of the Bush family, only to later become the target of a massive American invasion), you begin to see the pattern.
The U.S. has really replaced client state enemies it first builds up with cash bribes and then converts into enemies with client personality enemies, whom it nurtures with military support, provokes with a no-win decision (whatever did happen to April Glaspie?), and then invades in a profitable fit of righteous retribution. Are you getting the picture?
It's interesting reading some of the older stories about al-Qaeda, the so-called terror group founded by bin Laden in Afghanistan (and nurtured by Pakistani intelligence, which was covertly funded by the American CIA), and seeing how al-Qaeda fought side by side with American mercenaries in Bosnia, Kosovo, Macedonia and even Chechnya, but when they were conveniently needed as an excuse for going to war somewhere else (Afghanistan and Iraq), they were quickly converted into an enemy. Clearly, al-Qaeda is connected to the CIA, but for purposes of stealing Iraq's oil reserves, the U.S. connected them to Iraq, and got a major assist from what used to be called the American free press, but now is called something else, something far worse.
I guess you could call al-Qaeda a multi-purpose CIA asset, good for either good or bad activities. Al-Qaeda are claimed to the boogeymen who perpetrated 9/11 and were supposedly connected to Saddam. And yet when you go to find out about them, they disappear in a cloud of undercover spy dust, with no leads suddenly available as to where they might have disappeared. How utterly convenient. The real reason is because their controllers live at the Pentagon and other prestigious Washington addresses, not to mention a few palaces in Saudi Arabia that have ties to many American corporations.
Occasionally, the powers that be throw us a bone, like Moussaoui, or Richard Reid, just to try to prove there are actual terrorists out there. But how many more so-called terrorists have been allowed to slip away, under cover of CIA assistance? And, as in Yemen, how many more are prevented from being sought, lest they reveal their ties to the government in Washington?
Instead of having countries to blame for our ills, we now have mystical individuals - terrorists - who absolutely can't be found, except for those like Atta and the supposed hijackers who actually received training at U.S. military installations. Sound like a familiar technique?
For endless war, you must have an enemy who cannot be caught, who is completely vaporous, therefore necessitating nonstop aggressive emergency measures, variously colored alerts and tough talk for those who are unable to understand words. The perfect enemy for a state that seeks endless war and seeks forever to pull the wool over the eyes of its own citizens for purposes of endless robbery and implementing slavery where freedom previously existed would be an enemy who cannot, under any circumstances, ever be caught.
In the literal sense, this perfect enemy does not exist, which makes him perfect for a society determined to make war, because he will never be caught, and the war can continue forever. The harder an enemy is to find and defeat, the better it is for those who seek to destroy that enemy. The CIA's creation of al-Qaeda is the perfect recipe for those billionaires whose objective is endless conflict from which to make more money. This is the new era in which we find ourselves. It is the ultimate tilting at windmills, by which the elite who have always run America can perpetrate their vicious schemes of slavery, the gullible can continue to have their empty causes to cheer, and legitimate, God-fearing citizens can cower in fear while the very churches they support participate in the cover-up that supports the tyrants who oppress them.
This is the way the world is, and has always been. Only now it's worse, because the enemy is now a fabricated fiction, available for convenient blame in any and all disasters, no matter who actually perpetrated them. And thanks to media shills who don't ask real questions, well-bribed legislators devoid of conscience, law enforcers who help their patrons cover up crimes, and judges who have no interest in real justice, there is no end in sight for this war on freedom. (John Kaminski) - www.johnkaminski.com
The greatest art of a politician is to render vice serviceable to the cause of virtue. (Henry Bolingbroke, 1678-1751 British Politician)
The fact that there are nefarious motives behind the all pervasive, ever increasing media propaganda, is becoming so obvious that if it were not so serious and effective, it's transparency would be laughable. Once a person begins to discern the manipulation then one emerges into a whole new perception of reality. The public is continually and intentionally being set up for the expectation of certain future events. When these orchestrated events actually come to pass, many accept them as natural or even inevitable; after all, they were predicted.
David Icke termed a form of this covert manipulation as Problem - Reaction - Solution. Those in control intentionally create a problem, expect a certain reaction from the public and then offer a solution which was really the controller's original goal. Many times the public is made to believe that the solution was their idea which often results in the public demanding that their solution be implemented. This makes it all very easy for those in power. These methods are very deeply embedded into our media structure. (Marjorie Tietjen) - www.educate-yourself.org/cn/watchnewschoreograph05jan04.shtml
In the game of hegemony you require an enemy. Therefore, if he cannot be found, he must be manufactured. (Dean Fraser)
The plan was clear 20 years ago. The central struggle for the domination of the planet Earth would have it's locus in Eurasia (3/4 of the worlds resources and people are there). Bad luck for the people and cultures who currently inhabit Eurasia. The US military industrial juggernaut rampaging towards them is the most cunning, bloodthirsty and ruthless force seen since Adolf Hitler. But before this evil force takes over the world they have to take over America, for only if you have the complicity of the American people do you control the military engine for the imposition of this global Pax Americana.
But Americans have no thirst for global conquest. Unless of course; there is a sudden and terrifying threat! So what do you do when you have no enemies with the strength to attack you? - You attack yourself and say they did. The grand architect of this playing field of global conquest through deception and cunning is Zbigniew Brzezinski, the magnetic former National Security Advisor to the President, Trilateral Commission founder, distinguished board member of the Council of Foreign Relations, and honored host of the secret Bilderberg group. This heaviest of the heavyweights is now more influential in the dark machinations of global conquest than Henry Kissinger ever was. (Voxfux) - www.voxfux.com
…Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Carter's former national security adviser, wrote in a book called "The Grand Chessboard" that "America is too democratic at home to be autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America's power, especially its capacity for military intimidation." Brzezinski then concluded that in order to achieve this goal of increased military intimidation, what was needed was "a sudden threat or challenge to the public's sense of domestic well-being.” Hmm, that sounds an awful lot like 9/11.
Since Brzezinski is a member of two high-powered elitist groups, the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission, a real Attorney General would have some interesting choices among the names Brzezinski might cough up as his sources on how that information got to those investors who were savvy enough to make those "put option" trades because they knew 9/11 was coming down.
The other bunch of fools who put their prediction in writing and, in the mind of a real Attorney General, automatically qualify as suspects in the conspiracy to pull off the greatest crime in American history were all those so-called neocons who put their names in a report produced by a group called Project for a New American Century, known as PNAC, who included such well-known reptilians as Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, Paul Wolfowitz and others of their soulless ilk. Their PNAC report actually came out and said America's evolution into an unbridled military terror machine would need "some catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor." Now that really sounds like 9/11, doesn’t it? (John Kaminski) - www.johnkaminski.com
As America becomes an increasingly multicultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstances of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat. (The Grand Chessboard by Zbigniew Brzezinski)(NB) Zbigniew Brzezinski, who was National Security Adviser to President Jimmy Carter was one of the key architects of the Al Qaeda network, created by the CIA at the onslaught of the Soviet Afghan war (1979-1989).
